Knowledge

Real Estate, Finance & M&A Glossary

Key terms from real estate transactions, finance, valuation and M&A – explained clearly and in practical terms.

Term index

Real Estate & Valuation

›Gross Initial Yield

The initial gross rent in relation to the purchase price or the chosen valuation basis. The figure is quick to calculate and therefore common in market conversations. Depending on the calculation, acquisition costs, non-recoverable operating costs and maintenance provisions are excluded, so two assets with the same gross initial yield can be economically very different. Before comparing, clarify which rent basis and which cost items were used.

Gross Initial Yield = annual gross rent / purchase price

See also: Net Initial Yield, Purchase Price Multiple

›Net Initial Yield

The net initial yield (NIY) describes the initial net return of a property based on the income in place at the valuation date, meaning after deduction of costs that cannot be recovered from tenants. Under widely used institutional standards, in particular RICS and EPRA, net income is related to the property value or purchase price including the relevant acquisition costs. The precise calculation convention can vary by market report, data provider and purpose, so yield comparisons should always check the numerator, the denominator and the cost basis applied.

See also: NOI – Net Operating Income, Cap Rate / Capitalisation Rate

›Cap Rate / Capitalisation Rate

The capitalisation rate, or cap rate, describes the ratio of a defined one-year income figure to the property value and can be used within direct capitalisation to convert income into a value. Which income figure is applied – for example current, normalised or stabilised net operating income – depends on the valuation approach and the market or data convention used. The cap rate is not automatically the same as the net initial yield, nor is it the same as the Liegenschaftszinssatz used in the German income approach. Even small changes in the yield assumption shift the resulting value considerably, which is why valuations are run with ranges and sensitivities.

Value = income / cap rate

See also: NOI – Net Operating Income, Net Initial Yield

›Purchase Price Multiple

The purchase price in relation to annual rent – the most common shorthand for pricing in the German market. Multiple and yield are directly linked: the multiple is arithmetically the inverse of the yield on the same basis. What matters is the rent basis used: passing rent, market rent or an adjusted rent assumption lead to noticeably different multiples.

Multiple = purchase price / annual rent

See also: Gross Initial Yield, Passing Rent

›NOI – Net Operating Income

Sustainable net operating income of a property before financing costs, taxes and usually before certain owner-specific items. NOI comes from Anglo-American practice and is related to, but not identical with, the Jahresreinertrag of the German income approach; scope and cost treatment differ. Nor should it be equated with a company's EBITDA. Loan agreements often define the figure independently, so for metrics such as debt yield the contractual definition governs.

See also: Cap Rate / Capitalisation Rate, Debt Yield

›Passing Rent

The rent currently contracted and actually being paid. It is the starting point of any cash flow analysis but, on its own, says nothing about whether the asset is let above or below market.

See also: Market Rent, ERV – Estimated Rental Value

›ERV – Estimated Rental Value

A UK-derived valuation concept: the estimated rent achievable for a specific space under current market conditions. The ERV is an assumption made by the valuer or investor and is therefore narrower than the general notion of market rent; it is not the same as statutory rent concepts under German tenancy law. The gap between passing rent and ERV indicates whether re-letting or renewal offers upside or downside. Whether that potential can be realised depends on remaining terms, options, capital expenditure and market development.

See also: Passing Rent, Reversionary Potential

›Market Rent

The rent achievable for comparable space between independent parties under prevailing market conditions. It is neither the existing contract rent nor a statutory tenancy-law reference rent such as the German ortsübliche Vergleichsmiete, which follows its own legal rules. Market rent is derived from comparable lettings, market reports and an assessment of occupier demand; in a valuation model it is applied space by space as the ERV.

See also: ERV – Estimated Rental Value, Passing Rent

›Reversionary Potential

The potential to move existing rents towards market rent over time. Whether and when that potential can be captured depends on remaining lease terms, renewal options, indexation clauses, statutory limits and the capital expenditure and letting effort required. Valuations therefore reflect it over time and on a risk-adjusted basis.

See also: ERV – Estimated Rental Value, Market Rent, WAULT – Weighted Average Unexpired Lease Term

›Rent Roll

A structured overview of the key lease data of an asset. It is one of the first documents buyers and lenders request, because it reveals the cash flow profile, the expiry structure and tenant concentration. Typical components:

  • Tenant and use type
  • Area and rent
  • Lease start and lease expiry
  • Renewal options
  • Indexation
  • Break options and special termination rights

See also: WAULT – Weighted Average Unexpired Lease Term, Passing Rent

›WAULT – Weighted Average Unexpired Lease Term

The weighted average remaining term of the leases, usually weighted by rent or by area. It must be clarified whether the calculation runs to contractual expiry (to expiry) or to the next break option (to break) – both conventions are common and produce materially different figures. WAULT condenses the expiry structure into one number and indicates cash flow stability, re-letting risk and financeability. It says nothing about tenant credit quality or whether rents are in line with the market.

See also: WALT – Weighted Average Lease Term, Rent Roll

›WALT – Weighted Average Lease Term

The weighted average lease term. Market usage is not uniform: in some cases it refers to the unexpired term and is used synonymously with WAULT, in others to the agreed total term. Before comparing assets or portfolios, clarify the calculation definition.

See also: WAULT – Weighted Average Unexpired Lease Term

›Vacancy

A distinction is drawn between physical and economic vacancy. Physical vacancy refers to unlet space. Economic vacancy also captures space that is let but temporarily generates no or reduced income, for example during rent-free periods. For valuation and financing, economic vacancy is the more meaningful measure.

See also: NOI – Net Operating Income, Rent Roll

›CapEx

Investment in the building, fit-out or building services that changes the condition, usability or useful life of a property – for example roof refurbishment, plant replacement or tenant fit-out. CapEx is generally not treated as ongoing operating cost but planned separately and often financed separately. A robust CapEx plan is a prerequisite for realistic cash flow models.

See also: OpEx, NOI – Net Operating Income

›OpEx

Ongoing operating costs of running a property, such as management, maintenance, insurance and service charges. For the income analysis it is decisive which share is recoverable from tenants and which remains with the owner.

See also: CapEx, NOI – Net Operating Income

›ESG

Environmental, Social, Governance – criteria used by investors and lenders to assess non-financial aspects of a property or a company. ESG requirements can affect acquisition profiles, financing terms, reporting obligations and the universe of potential buyers. They do not automatically create value; what matters is the asset, the market and the specific requirements of the counterparty.

See also: CRREM, Green Loan

›CRREM

Carbon Risk Real Estate Monitor – an initiative providing decarbonisation pathways and analytical tools for real estate. It allows the emissions and energy performance of a building to be viewed against defined climate pathways. The CRREM misalignment year – previously referred to by CRREM as the “stranding year” – is the year in which the energy or carbon intensity of a building exceeds the applicable CRREM decarbonisation pathway. A CRREM misalignment year does not automatically mean that a property is economically a stranded asset or will suffer a particular loss in value. Results depend heavily on data quality, system boundaries and the pathway chosen, and do not replace an asset-specific technical assessment.

See also: Stranded Asset, ESG

›Stranded Asset

A property where economic, regulatory, technical or market developments may lead to substantial adaptation requirements or to value and usability risks. The cause may be energy performance requirements, but equally shifting occupier demand, outdated building services or restrictions on use. The term is broader than a pure climate pathway analysis: a model-based CRREM misalignment signals a need to act but is not in itself evidence that an asset is stranded. What governs is the asset-specific assessment of capital expenditure, alternative use and market acceptance.

See also: CRREM, CapEx

›Core / Core+ / Value-Add / Opportunistic

A common classification of real estate investments by risk and return profile. Core describes stably let assets in established locations with little to do, Core+ largely stable assets with limited optimisation needs, Value-Add assets requiring letting, refurbishment or repositioning work, and Opportunistic situations with a high development, conversion or restructuring component. The boundaries are not fully standardised and investors apply them differently.

See also: Exit, Equity

Real Estate Transactions

›Asset Deal

Acquisition of the property itself or of specifically defined assets. The buyer takes over the items and legal relationships identified in the agreement; leases generally transfer to the acquirer under statutory rules. Legal, tax and accounting consequences depend on the specific structure and need to be assessed case by case.

Real estate transactions

See also: Share Deal, SPA – Sale and Purchase Agreement

›Share Deal

Acquisition of shares in the property-holding company rather than of the asset itself. The company remains the owner and, in principle, the contracting party to existing agreements. Change-of-control provisions, consent requirements, termination rights and financing terms in material contracts require careful review. On the buy side the structure calls for broader corporate, tax and financing due diligence, because historical risks and liabilities remain within the company.

Real estate transactions

See also: Asset Deal, Change of Control, Due Diligence

›Off-Market

Targeted approach to a limited group of buyers without broad public marketing. The benefits lie in discretion, control and avoiding market fatigue for the asset. A higher price does not follow automatically: a smaller audience means less price competition, so the selection of investors approached and the quality of the documentation are decisive.

See also: Structured Sales Process, Competitive Process

›Structured Sales Process

Organising a sale with defined process steps, staged levels of information, bid deadlines and, where appropriate, several bidding rounds. The aim is a comparable level of information for all interested parties and genuine comparability of offers – not only on price, but also on structure, evidence of financing and timetable.

Transaction process

See also: Competitive Process, Off-Market

›Competitive Process

A process involving several potential acquirers and defined bidding phases, usually starting with indicative offers and continuing with binding offers after due diligence. A competitive process creates comparability and process discipline, but does not automatically produce the highest price; market conditions, asset quality and the composition of the bidder field remain decisive.

See also: Indicative Offer, Structured Sales Process

›Indicative Offer

A first, usually non-binding indication of price and transaction structure based on limited information. It serves to pre-select bidders and to determine who is given access to detailed diligence.

See also: NBO – Non-Binding Offer, Binding Offer

›NBO – Non-Binding Offer

A non-binding offer setting out price expectation, structure, financing approach and timetable without creating an obligation to complete. Unlike a binding offer it is subject to further review; individual provisions such as confidentiality or exclusivity may nevertheless be agreed as binding.

See also: Binding Offer, LOI – Letter of Intent

›Binding Offer

An offer submitted after diligence has been completed or largely completed, usually reflecting a draft agreement. Even an offer described as binding may still contain conditions, for example on board approvals or financing. The actual legal effect depends on how it is drafted.

See also: NBO – Non-Binding Offer, Conditions Precedent

›LOI – Letter of Intent

A letter of intent recording the key commercial parameters of a planned transaction. Typical contents:

  • Purchase price or valuation range
  • Transaction structure
  • Scope and process of due diligence
  • Exclusivity
  • Timetable
  • Financing

See also: NDA – Non-Disclosure Agreement, Binding Offer

›NDA – Non-Disclosure Agreement

A confidentiality agreement governing the handling, disclosure and use of information provided during the process. It usually stands at the beginning of a transaction, before asset-specific documents are shared.

See also: Virtual Data Room, LOI – Letter of Intent

›Due Diligence

Systematic review of an asset, a company or a portfolio prior to acquisition. Depending on the transaction, the individual workstreams are taken to different depths:

  • Legal: title, encumbrances, contracts, permits
  • Tax: tax history and structure
  • Financial: income, cost and cash flow analysis
  • Technical: building fabric, services, deferred maintenance
  • Commercial: market, letting, competition
  • ESG and environmental, where relevant

Due diligence in detail

See also: Vendor Due Diligence, Virtual Data Room

›Vendor Due Diligence

A review commissioned by the sell side before or during the sales process. It creates transparency on known issues, speeds up the process and reduces surprises in negotiation. It does not replace buy-side diligence; buyers and their lenders regularly conduct their own review.

See also: Due Diligence

›Virtual Data Room

A structured digital environment in which transaction documents are made available, versioned and access-controlled with an audit trail. Structure and completeness of the data room have a material influence on the length of diligence, the volume of queries and how robust the offers submitted are.

See also: Due Diligence, NDA – Non-Disclosure Agreement

›SPA – Sale and Purchase Agreement

The purchase agreement for a transaction. In real estate, a distinction must be drawn between the agreement covering the property in an asset deal and the share purchase agreement in a share deal. It governs, among other things, the subject matter, price and payment mechanics, warranties, indemnities, conditions precedent and the transfer of benefits and burdens.

See also: Asset Deal, Share Deal, Signing

›Signing

Execution of the transaction agreement. At signing the transaction is contractually agreed, but completion usually follows later – once the agreed conditions precedent have been satisfied.

See also: Closing, Conditions Precedent

›Closing

Completion of the transaction once the agreed conditions precedent have been satisfied or validly waived. It is generally only at closing that the purchase price is paid and title or shares transfer. Signing and closing must therefore be clearly distinguished; the period in between is governed by the agreement.

See also: Signing, Conditions Precedent

›Conditions Precedent

Conditions that must be satisfied or validly waived before closing. These may include regulatory approvals, consents from contractual counterparties, board resolutions, the repayment of existing financing or the availability of new funds. Which conditions apply follows from the individual agreement.

See also: Closing, Change of Control

›Change of Control

A contractual clause attaching legal consequences to a change of control over a company. It is frequently found in financing, lease, operator and joint venture agreements. Possible consequences:

  • Consent requirement
  • Notification obligation
  • Termination right
  • Adjustment right
  • Repayment obligation

See also: Share Deal, Conditions Precedent

›Forward Deal

An umbrella term for acquisition structures in which an asset is sold before completion. Structures range from forward purchase, with payment largely on completion, to forward funding, with capital provided during construction. What matters in each case is the contractual payment mechanism and the allocation of construction, letting and completion risk.

See also: Forward Purchase, Forward Funding

›Forward Purchase

An acquisition structure in which the buyer generally pays the substantial part of the purchase price only on or after completion and once agreed conditions are met. Construction risk therefore largely remains with the developer. The specific structure, including deposits, security and handover criteria, can differ case by case.

See also: Forward Funding, Forward Deal

›Forward Funding

A structure in which the buyer provides capital during development or construction in line with the contractual arrangement, typically against construction progress. The developer reduces its own capital requirement, while the buyer takes on part of the project risk and secures access to the completed asset. There is no single standard structure; payment schedule, security, rental guarantees and completion provisions are agreed individually.

Forward funding & forward purchase

See also: Forward Purchase, Forward Deal

›Exit

The planned way out of an investment, for example through a sale to an end investor, a refinancing or a transfer into long-term holding. The exit assumption is a central part of any calculation and is regularly tested independently by lenders, because it determines repayment and return.

See also: Core / Core+ / Value-Add / Opportunistic, Waterfall

Finance

›Senior Debt

First-ranking or senior debt financing, typically secured by land charges and further security. Senior debt is provided not only by banks but also by insurers, debt funds and other institutional lenders. It is usually the largest and lowest-priced tranche in the capital stack and, through covenants and drawdown conditions, sets the framework for subordinated tranches.

Senior debt

See also: Junior Debt, Mezzanine, LTV – Loan to Value

›Mezzanine

Capital that sits economically between senior debt and equity. Depending on how it is structured, mezzanine can have predominantly debt-like features, for example a subordinated loan with a fixed coupon, or equity-like features through profit participation or conversion rights. The characterisation affects ranking, security, accounting and tax treatment and needs to be assessed case by case.

Mezzanine capital

See also: Junior Debt, Preferred Equity, Intercreditor Agreement

›Junior Debt

A subordinated debt tranche ranking between senior debt and equity. It is served after senior capital and therefore carries higher risk, reflected in pricing and in tighter control rights. Its relationship with the senior tranche is normally governed by an intercreditor agreement.

See also: Senior Debt, Mezzanine, Intercreditor Agreement

›Whole Loan

A financing solution in which one lender covers a leverage range that goes beyond a conventional senior-only tranche. For the borrower this means one counterparty, one set of documentation and one process, which can shorten the time to drawdown. Whether and how the lender internally tranches or syndicates the exposure depends on the lender.

Whole loan

See also: Senior Debt, Junior Debt

›Bridge Financing

Short-term interim financing until a defined event – a refinancing, a sale, completion or the availability of long-term debt. The credibility of the exit is decisive: with bridge structures, lenders focus above all on how and when repayment is to occur.

Bridge finance

See also: Exit, Term Sheet

›LTV – Loan to Value

The loan amount in relation to the value of the property. What matters is which value is used – market value or mortgage lending value – and as at which date. LTV is a central risk metric for lenders and is frequently agreed as a covenant.

LTV = loan amount / property value

See also: LTC – Loan to Cost, Debt Yield, Covenant

›LTC – Loan to Cost

The loan amount in relation to total project costs. For developments, LTC is more meaningful than LTV because no stabilised income value exists during construction. Which cost items form part of total project costs is defined in the loan agreement.

LTC = loan amount / total project costs

See also: LTV – Loan to Value, Senior Debt

›DSCR – Debt Service Coverage Ratio

The cash flow available for debt service in relation to debt service from interest and amortisation. Values below 1.0 mean that, arithmetically, current cash flow does not cover debt service. The precise definition – which income and costs are included and over which period it is measured – can differ by loan agreement.

DSCR = cash flow available for debt service / debt service

See also: ICR – Interest Coverage Ratio, Covenant, Debt Yield

›ICR – Interest Coverage Ratio

A defined income or cash flow measure in relation to interest expense. Unlike DSCR it does not take amortisation into account and is therefore particularly relevant for bullet structures. The specific definition varies by loan agreement.

ICR = defined income / interest expense

See also: DSCR – Debt Service Coverage Ratio, Covenant

›Debt Yield

Sustainable net income in relation to the loan amount. The metric measures the income the asset generates per unit of debt and, unlike DSCR or ICR, does not depend directly on interest rate, amortisation or term. It is therefore used to compare financings independently of the prevailing rate environment.

Debt Yield = sustainable net income / loan amount

See also: NOI – Net Operating Income, LTV – Loan to Value, DSCR – Debt Service Coverage Ratio

›Covenant

A contractual condition in a loan agreement. A distinction is drawn between financial covenants, information undertakings and positive or negative undertakings. Typical financial covenants:

  • LTV
  • DSCR
  • ICR
  • Debt Yield

See also: Covenant Breach, Cash Sweep

›Covenant Breach

A breach of a condition in the loan agreement. The consequences follow from the contract and range from information and remedy obligations through distribution lock-ups and additional amortisation to termination rights. Cure periods, cash cure mechanics or a waiver are frequently provided for, so not every breach leads directly to termination.

See also: Covenant, Cash Sweep

›Cash Sweep

A mechanism under which defined excess cash flows are applied in whole or in part to additional repayment rather than distributed to equity. Cash sweeps are often linked to meeting or missing certain financial metrics.

See also: Covenant, Amortisation

›Amortisation

Scheduled repayment of the loan over its term. The level and structure of amortisation affect debt service and therefore directly influence DSCR as well as the outstanding balance at maturity.

See also: Bullet Loan, DSCR – Debt Service Coverage Ratio

›Bullet Loan

A loan whose principal is repaid substantially at maturity. During the term, interest and possibly reduced amortisation are paid. The timing of refinancing or sale at maturity is correspondingly important for planning.

See also: Amortisation, Bridge Financing

›Non-Recourse

Financing in which recourse is in principle limited to the project, the property company and the security granted. In practice there are frequently exceptions: completion, cost overrun or interest guarantees as well as recourse carve-outs for specified conduct. The actual scope follows from the documentation.

See also: Limited Recourse, Covenant

›Limited Recourse

Financing with contractually limited recourse to the sponsor or shareholders, for example capped in amount, limited in time or restricted to specified circumstances. The line between this and non-recourse is fluid and follows from the guarantees agreed.

See also: Non-Recourse

›Intercreditor Agreement

An agreement between senior and subordinated lenders on ranking, cash flows, information rights, standstill obligations and enforcement rights. It governs in particular who may take which steps in a distress situation and in what order proceeds are distributed. For subordinated tranches it is often as important as the loan agreement itself.

See also: Junior Debt, Mezzanine, Waterfall

›Term Sheet

A summary of the key commercial and structural financing terms ahead of full loan documentation – amount, term, margin, security, covenants and drawdown conditions. Whether and to what extent a term sheet is binding depends on how it is drafted; frequently only individual provisions are binding.

See also: Margin, Covenant

›Margin

The credit margin charged above the agreed reference rate. It reflects risk, ranking, term and structure and can be linked to financial metrics, for example through a margin ratchet tied to LTV.

See also: EURIBOR, Term Sheet

›EURIBOR

The euro money market reference rate used as the basis for interest calculation in floating rate financings. Agreements typically specify a particular tenor as well as provisions for negative values or for the discontinuation of the reference rate.

See also: Margin, Hedging

›Hedging

Instruments used to limit or manage interest rate risk, such as an interest rate swap or cap. Loan agreements often require hedging to a specified extent. Cost, term and structure feed directly into debt service and therefore into financing metrics.

See also: EURIBOR, DSCR – Debt Service Coverage Ratio

›Green Loan

Financing whose proceeds are applied to contractually defined sustainable purposes – the defining feature is the use of proceeds. Criteria, evidence and reporting duties are set in the loan agreement and typically follow market frameworks. This differs from a sustainability-linked loan, where the use of proceeds is generally unrestricted but the terms are tied to meeting agreed sustainability metrics. In neither case do better terms follow automatically; any effect on margin or availability depends on the lender and the individual case.

See also: ESG, CRREM

›Equity

The sponsor's or investor's own capital. It ranks behind all debt tranches, bears the first loss and in return participates in the upside. The amount and composition of equity is a central assessment criterion for lenders.

Equity & joint venture

See also: Preferred Equity, Waterfall

›Preferred Equity

Capital with economic rights that rank ahead of ordinary equity, for example a priority distribution or preferential repayment. Depending on the structure, additional control or consent rights may be agreed. Preferred equity should not generally be classified as debt; legal and accounting treatment follow the specific structure.

See also: Mezzanine, Preferred Return, Equity

›Preferred Return

A priority minimum return due to a capital partner before further profits are shared. It is normally part of the agreed distribution order and may be structured on a cumulative basis.

See also: Waterfall, Promote

›Waterfall

The contractually defined order in which proceeds are distributed to debt and equity providers – typically debt service first, then return of invested capital, then the preferred return and finally the profit split. How it is structured determines who actually receives proceeds in a given situation.

See also: Preferred Return, Promote, Intercreditor Agreement

›Promote

A disproportionate profit share for the operating partner once defined return hurdles are exceeded. The promote is intended to align the interests of capital provider and operating partner; hurdles, tiers and the calculation basis are agreed individually.

See also: Waterfall, Preferred Return

M&A & Corporate Finance

›Enterprise Value

The value of a company's operating business before the net debt and cash positions agreed for the transaction are taken into account. Enterprise value is the usual reference figure for multiples and comparisons because it is largely independent of the financing structure. It is not the same as equity value; the bridge between the two is agreed in the transaction.

Company valuation

See also: Equity Value, Enterprise-to-Equity Value Bridge, Net Debt

›Equity Value

The value attributed to the shareholders on the basis of the agreed price bridge, that is the amount actually payable for the shares. It is derived from enterprise value after taking into account the contractually defined debt-like and cash-like items and any working capital adjustment.

See also: Enterprise Value, Enterprise-to-Equity Value Bridge

›Enterprise-to-Equity Value Bridge

The bridge from enterprise value to equity value. Typical components can include:

  • Net debt
  • Cash
  • Working capital
  • Further agreed debt-like and cash-like items

See also: Enterprise Value, Equity Value, Net Debt

›EBITDA

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation of tangible assets and amortisation of intangible assets. It serves as an approximation of operating earning power but is not a cash flow measure: capital expenditure, working capital movements and tax payments are excluded. In M&A processes it is usually not reported EBITDA that is used as the reference figure for multiples, but a normalised or adjusted figure.

See also: Adjusted EBITDA, EBIT, Multiple

›Adjusted EBITDA

EBITDA after agreed or analysed adjustments for one-off effects, for example non-recurring expenses, non-operating items or atypical shareholder remuneration. Which adjustments are accepted is a matter of negotiation and of financial due diligence; not every adjustment proposed by a seller is accepted by buyers.

See also: EBITDA, Due Diligence

›EBIT

Earnings before interest and taxes. Unlike EBITDA it includes depreciation and amortisation and therefore reflects the capital intensity of a business model more accurately.

See also: EBITDA

›Multiple

A valuation factor applied to a financial metric, for example EV/EBITDA or EV/EBIT. Multiples are derived from comparable transactions or listed peers. Their level depends heavily on sector, growth, earnings stability, risk profile, company size and market environment; transferring them to a specific case without adjustment is rarely robust.

See also: EBITDA, Enterprise Value, DCF – Discounted Cash Flow

›DCF – Discounted Cash Flow

A valuation method in which expected future cash flows are discounted to a valuation date. The quality and range of the result depend substantially on planning assumptions, discount rate and terminal value. In practice a DCF result is regularly sense-checked against multiple-based analysis.

Company valuation

See also: Multiple, Enterprise Value

›Net Debt

Net financial debt as defined for the specific transaction, in principle interest-bearing liabilities less cash. There is no universally fixed calculation: which items count as debt-like – for example pension obligations, leases or declared distributions – is negotiated and defined in the purchase agreement.

See also: Enterprise-to-Equity Value Bridge, Cash-free / Debt-free

›Working Capital

Short-term operating current assets less certain short-term operating liabilities. In transactions a normalised target level is usually agreed; deviations at the reference date lead to a price adjustment. The transaction definition can differ from the accounting view.

See also: Completion Accounts / Closing Accounts, Enterprise-to-Equity Value Bridge

›Cash-free / Debt-free

A valuation basis under which the company is considered without financial debt and without cash. The equity value is then derived from the resulting enterprise value via the price bridge. This basis is common in M&A processes but is not agreed in every transaction.

See also: Net Debt, Enterprise-to-Equity Value Bridge

›Locked Box

A price mechanism with an economic reference date in the past and an equity value that is in principle fixed. The economic result from the reference date accrues to the buyer, protected through leakage provisions. The mechanism creates price certainty but requires reliable accounts as at the reference date.

See also: Leakage, Completion Accounts / Closing Accounts

›Leakage

Value transfers to the seller or connected parties between the locked box date and closing, to the extent they are not expressly agreed as permitted leakage – for example distributions, advisory fees or payments outside the ordinary course of business. The purchase agreement governs evidence, time limits and repayment.

See also: Locked Box

›Completion Accounts / Closing Accounts

A price mechanism under which certain balance sheet and financial items are determined at closing and used to adjust the purchase price, typically net debt and working capital. It reflects the position at completion more accurately than a locked box, but extends the process and can lead to post-closing disputes.

See also: Locked Box, Working Capital

›Earn-out

A variable component of the purchase price whose payment depends on future agreed results or other defined criteria. Earn-outs bridge differing expectations about future performance. What matters is an unambiguous measurement basis, rules on how the business is run during the earn-out period and a clear dispute resolution mechanism.

See also: Vendor Loan, SPA – Sale and Purchase Agreement

›Vendor Loan

A financing component under which the seller leaves part of the purchase price outstanding as a loan. It can close funding gaps and signal confidence in the continuation of the business. Ranking, term, interest and security are normally coordinated with the other capital providers.

See also: Earn-out, Junior Debt

›Management Buy-out – MBO

Acquisition of a company or a shareholding by the existing management, frequently together with a financial investor and using acquisition finance. Key topics are the management's own contribution, the participation programme and governance.

Succession

See also: Management Buy-in – MBI, Financial Investor

›Management Buy-in – MBI

Acquisition or investment by external management that subsequently takes over the running of the business. Compared with an MBO there is greater onboarding and information risk, so due diligence and transition arrangements carry particular weight.

See also: Management Buy-out – MBO

›Add-on Acquisition

Acquisition of a further company by an existing platform or group. The objectives are usually market access, capabilities, capacity or scale effects. Integration effort is frequently underestimated in the valuation.

See also: Buy-and-Build, Buy-Side

›Buy-and-Build

A strategy in which a platform company is developed through a series of acquisitions. The economic effect depends on whether integration, management capacity and financing keep pace with the rate of acquisition.

See also: Add-on Acquisition, Financial Investor

›Carve-out

The separation and disposal of a business unit, division or individual activities from a larger organisation. Key questions concern the delineation of assets, contracts and personnel as well as transitional services from the seller. Carve-outs require standalone financial information for the unit being separated.

See also: Due Diligence, Sell-Side

›Sell-Side

Advisory and process management on the seller's side: preparing the documentation, approaching and selecting interested parties, managing the bidding phases and supporting negotiations through to completion.

Company sale

See also: Buy-Side, Structured Sales Process

›Buy-Side

Advisory and process management on the buyer's side: target definition and approach, valuation, structuring, financing as well as managing due diligence and negotiation.

Company acquisition

See also: Sell-Side, Due Diligence

›Strategic Buyer

A company pursuing an acquisition for operational or strategic reasons, for example market access, technology, capacity or customer relationships. Strategic buyers may factor in synergies but often require closer integration and correspondingly detailed diligence.

See also: Financial Investor, Buy-Side

›Financial Investor

An investor whose decision is driven primarily by financial return and value creation objectives. Possible categories include private equity firms, family offices or institutional investors. Holding period, stake size and degree of influence differ considerably by investor type.

Private equity

See also: Strategic Buyer, Management Buy-out – MBO

›W&I Insurance

Warranty & indemnity insurance covering certain warranty risks arising from an M&A transaction. It can limit the seller's economic liability and ease negotiations on liability caps. Only the risks covered by the policy are insured; known matters and certain areas are regularly excluded.

See also: SPA – Sale and Purchase Agreement, Due Diligence

A term still unclear?

We prefer explaining structures in conversation rather than in a glossary.

Legal and tax notice

The information on this website is provided for general information on real estate, financing and corporate transactions only. It does not constitute legal, tax or other individual professional advice and cannot replace case-specific advice from suitably qualified lawyers, tax advisers or other professionals.

The legal and tax consequences of a transaction depend in particular on its specific structure, the parties involved, existing contracts and the applicable legal and tax framework. Such questions should therefore be reviewed individually by the relevant professional advisers before any decision is taken.

Within the content presented on this website, Fox Capital does not provide legal or tax advice.

Get in touch now