Genuine competition on terms
Several houses review in parallel – which shows in margin, fees and covenants.
Financing · Senior debt
In many real estate financings, senior debt forms the senior-ranking debt tranche – we run it in competition instead of accepting the first quote.
Senior debt is the senior-ranking loan, regularly secured by senior-ranking real estate security. Because of its senior risk position, senior debt typically carries lower financing costs than subordinated capital, and it sets the framework for junior tranches through covenants and drawdown conditions.
Economics are not driven by the interest rate alone but by the interplay of leverage, amortisation profile, covenants, drawdown conditions, prepayment terms and enforcement rights. On leverage it also matters whether the ratio refers to market value (LTV), to an internally determined lending value, or, for developments, to total cost (LTC) – the reference base changes the result considerably.
The pool of potential lenders is wider than often assumed: commercial banks, savings banks, mortgage banks, insurers, pension institutions and debt funds with bank-like structures. Each house has its own review grid, asset preferences and regional focus.
Benefits
Several houses review in parallel – which shows in margin, fees and covenants.
Costings, rent roll, cash flow and sensitivities prepared the way credit committees need them.
Not only the margin counts: DSCR, LTV triggers, cash sweep and top-up provisions are negotiated as well.
Access to banks, insurers, pension institutions and debt funds with different risk profiles.
A managed process avoids idle time between valuation, due diligence and committee dates.
The senior tranche is considered together with junior capital or equity from the outset.
Process
Assessment of location, cash flow, lease structure and borrower credit standing.
Definition of volume, structure, interest terms and the target lender group.
Targeted, parallel approach to suitable houses with complete credit papers.
Comparison of margin, fees, leverage measures, covenants and prepayment terms.
Support through credit committee, documentation and drawdown.
From practice
Two quotes compare two review grids. We approach several houses in parallel – banks, insurers, pension institutions, debt funds. Only then do margin, fees and covenants become genuinely comparable.
LTV refers to the property value, the lending-value ratio to an internally determined lending value, LTC to total cost. Two offers with the same percentage can therefore mean very different loan amounts.
Everybody discusses the margin; LTV triggers, DSCR thresholds, cash sweep and top-up obligations far less. That is exactly where a delayed project runs into trouble.
Committees read to their own template. Presenting cash flow, sensitivities and security overview the way the house needs them shortens the decision.
Energy standard, certification and refurbishment roadmap are now regularly part of lenders' review grids. How strongly this feeds into pricing differs from house to house.
Questions
The structures described are for general information. Availability, leverage, term, pricing, security and other terms depend on the asset, the borrower, the market environment and the specific financing. None of this constitutes a financing commitment.
Also relevant
Most structures end up as a combination. These are the pieces we mix most often.
Send us your key figures — we respond with a reliable first assessment.