Financing · Senior debt

Senior debt

In many real estate financings, senior debt forms the senior-ranking debt tranche – we run it in competition instead of accepting the first quote.

Senior debt is the senior-ranking loan, regularly secured by senior-ranking real estate security. Because of its senior risk position, senior debt typically carries lower financing costs than subordinated capital, and it sets the framework for junior tranches through covenants and drawdown conditions.

Economics are not driven by the interest rate alone but by the interplay of leverage, amortisation profile, covenants, drawdown conditions, prepayment terms and enforcement rights. On leverage it also matters whether the ratio refers to market value (LTV), to an internally determined lending value, or, for developments, to total cost (LTC) – the reference base changes the result considerably.

The pool of potential lenders is wider than often assumed: commercial banks, savings banks, mortgage banks, insurers, pension institutions and debt funds with bank-like structures. Each house has its own review grid, asset preferences and regional focus.

Suitable for

  • Acquisition of standing assets with stable cash flow
  • Developments with secured planning consent
  • Extensions and follow-on financings
  • Portfolio financings across several assets
  • Refinancing of existing loans

Key facts

Mandate size
from € 10m
Ranking
senior
Leverage measures
LTV, lending value or LTC
Interest
floating or fixed
Security
typically senior-ranking real estate security; in Germany often a first-ranking land charge
First indication
targeted within 48 hours
Request terms

Benefits

Why this structure works

01

Genuine competition on terms

Several houses review in parallel – which shows in margin, fees and covenants.

02

Bankable documentation

Costings, rent roll, cash flow and sensitivities prepared the way credit committees need them.

03

Covenants in focus

Not only the margin counts: DSCR, LTV triggers, cash sweep and top-up provisions are negotiated as well.

04

The right houses, not just your bank

Access to banks, insurers, pension institutions and debt funds with different risk profiles.

05

Structured timetable

A managed process avoids idle time between valuation, due diligence and committee dates.

06

Combinable

The senior tranche is considered together with junior capital or equity from the outset.

Process

How we proceed

  1. Step 01

    Asset and credit analysis

    Assessment of location, cash flow, lease structure and borrower credit standing.

  2. Step 02

    Financing strategy

    Definition of volume, structure, interest terms and the target lender group.

  3. Step 03

    Lender process

    Targeted, parallel approach to suitable houses with complete credit papers.

  4. Step 04

    Offer comparison

    Comparison of margin, fees, leverage measures, covenants and prepayment terms.

  5. Step 05

    Committees & drawdown

    Support through credit committee, documentation and drawdown.

From practice

What actually decides the deal

Do not stop at your house bank

Two quotes compare two review grids. We approach several houses in parallel – banks, insurers, pension institutions, debt funds. Only then do margin, fees and covenants become genuinely comparable.

Check the reference base of the leverage

LTV refers to the property value, the lending-value ratio to an internally determined lending value, LTC to total cost. Two offers with the same percentage can therefore mean very different loan amounts.

Covenants are negotiable

Everybody discusses the margin; LTV triggers, DSCR thresholds, cash sweep and top-up obligations far less. That is exactly where a delayed project runs into trouble.

Documents in credit-committee format

Committees read to their own template. Presenting cash flow, sensitivities and security overview the way the house needs them shortens the decision.

ESG is part of the review

Energy standard, certification and refurbishment roadmap are now regularly part of lenders' review grids. How strongly this feeds into pricing differs from house to house.

Questions

What clients ask us most

The structures described are for general information. Availability, leverage, term, pricing, security and other terms depend on the asset, the borrower, the market environment and the specific financing. None of this constitutes a financing commitment.

Is this the right structure for your project?

Send us your key figures — we respond with a reliable first assessment.

Get in touch now