One lender
One credit decision, one set of documents – no alignment between two houses on ranking and cash-flow waterfall.
Financing · Whole loan
A financing solution in which one lender covers a leverage range that goes beyond a classic senior-only tranche.
In a whole loan, a single lender provides debt across a leverage range that can extend beyond a classic senior-only tranche. For the borrower this means one counterparty, one set of documentation and one process. Whether and how the lender tranches internally or places parts onward depends on the individual house.
Compared with a combination of a senior loan and a separate junior tranche, the negotiation between two lenders as well as subordination and intercreditor arrangements between different houses fall away. Whether this route is economically preferable only becomes clear once total cost and drawdown conditions of both variants are compared.
Whole loan providers are mostly debt funds, specialist lenders and individual banks with their own real estate credit platform. We know their review grids and approach the houses whose mandate fits the asset and the business plan.
Benefits
One credit decision, one set of documents – no alignment between two houses on ranking and cash-flow waterfall.
A whole loan can cover a range beyond a senior-only tranche without negotiating a separate junior tranche.
One facility agreement instead of parallel contracts with intercreditor terms, which reduces coordination effort.
Interim uses, vacancy and repositioning can also be considered by the relevant houses.
Remuneration is negotiated as a single overall condition and can be set against the senior-plus-junior alternative.
Once stabilised, it can be assessed whether a refinancing with senior-ranking capital makes economic sense.
Process
Asset, business plan and timeline are assessed for whole loan feasibility.
Approach to debt funds and lenders whose review grid fits the asset.
Comparison of pricing, fees, drawdown conditions, amortisation and covenants.
One facility agreement instead of parallel contracts – legal advice sits with your lawyers.
Drawdown and early planning of the later refinancing.
From practice
A whole loan has to be compared with senior plus junior – including all fees, commitment interest, advisory cost and the time needed to align two houses. Only then can you judge which variant is preferable in the specific case.
The focus is on asset quality and location, business and cost plan, planning status and construction progress, letting or sales, the security package, the sponsor's own funds, track record and the exit or refinancing scenario.
In construction-linked structures, drawdowns, monitoring and evidence requirements drive liquidity planning. These points belong in the term sheet, not in final documentation.
Whole loan lenders regularly price minimum terms or minimum returns. If an early exit is realistic, the prepayment clause belongs in the first negotiation round.
Questions
The structures described are for general information. Availability, leverage, term, pricing, security and other terms depend on the asset, the borrower, the market environment and the specific financing. None of this constitutes a financing commitment.
Also relevant
Most structures end up as a combination. These are the pieces we mix most often.
Send us your key figures — we respond with a reliable first assessment.