All articles

Transactions

Asset deal or share deal? A decision framework

Object of purchase, contract transfer, tax consequences and buyer universe: raising the structuring question mid-process costs negotiating room.

August 2026Updated: September 2026Fox Capital editorial team

In practice the structuring question is often raised late. The teaser is frequently already in the market and first indications are in before tax and legal advisers are involved. By then the negotiating position is largely set, and changing course costs time and credibility.

The economic differences, however, can be named early — long before the first investor is approached.

Note: the following provides a general overview of possible transaction structures and related questions. It does not constitute legal or tax advice. The specific legal and tax consequences should be reviewed for each transaction by the relevant professional advisers.

What is transferred in an asset deal and in a share deal

In an asset deal, individual assets are transferred — in real estate transactions in particular the land and the building together with the related legal relationships. The object of purchase is comparatively clearly defined.

In a share deal, shares in the target or property-holding company are transferred. The company generally remains the owner of its assets and the contracting party to its existing contracts. In material financing, lease, operator and other key contracts, however, change-of-control, consent or other provisions may be relevant. What legal consequences arise in a specific case should be reviewed by the respective legal advisers.

Economic factors that influence the choice of structure

First, the scope of review. Acquiring shares means acquiring a company with a history. Corporate, tax, financing and accounting topics then belong in the due diligence; warranties and indemnities can address risks, but their reach depends on the drafting.

Second, the tax dimension. Asset deals and share deals can have different tax consequences for buyer and seller. For real estate located in Germany, these may include income tax aspects, depreciation bases under German tax law and German real estate transfer tax. The legal and tax consequences differ by jurisdiction and should be reviewed by the respective local advisers before the transaction structure is fixed.

Third, financing. An existing financing can in principle remain with the company, provided the finance documents allow it and the required lender consents are obtained. Depending on drafting, change-of-control provisions may concern consent, information, adjustment, termination or repayment rights.

Fourth, the buyer universe. Some institutional investors do not acquire companies with a history for internal reasons; others expressly prefer share acquisitions because they consolidate into existing structures. Committing early narrows the addressable market.

Real estate transfer tax in Germany: general context

For German real estate transactions, share transfers in property-holding companies can, under certain conditions, also trigger real estate transfer tax. What matters are the provisions of the German Real Estate Transfer Tax Act, in particular the taxable events, participation thresholds and time periods set out there.

Which events apply in a specific case, and what tax consequences arise, should be reviewed by a tax adviser. The notion that a share deal simply avoids real estate transfer tax does not hold. Other jurisdictions apply different rules; assessment there belongs with the respective local advisers.

What this means economically

The chosen transaction structure can materially affect price, tax position, financing, buyer universe and risk allocation. That is precisely why it belongs at the beginning of the process.

In practice we proceed as follows: before going to market, the structure is set together with the seller's tax and legal advisers, modelled economically in variants and disclosed in the teaser. Bidders then calculate on the same basis and offers become comparable.

The most common obstacle

A property company never intended as a sale vehicle: incomplete annual accounts, unresolved shareholder loans, open tax audit items. Much of this can be prepared — but not on the side.

The structuring question should ideally be resolved before buyer outreach begins. Where corporate, financing or tax matters are complex, considerable lead time may be required.

In short

Structure belongs before the market approach. Asset deal and share deal differ in object of purchase, review scope, financing and buyer universe — the legal and tax assessment belongs with the respective advisers.

Want to go deeper?

Half an hour on the phone usually beats ten pages of paper.

Legal and tax notice

The information on this website is provided for general information on real estate, financing and corporate transactions only. It does not constitute legal, tax or other individual professional advice and cannot replace case-specific advice from suitably qualified lawyers, tax advisers or other professionals.

The legal and tax consequences of a transaction depend in particular on its specific structure, the parties involved, existing contracts and the applicable legal and tax framework. Such questions should therefore be reviewed individually by the relevant professional advisers before any decision is taken.

Within the content presented on this website, Fox Capital does not provide legal or tax advice.

Get in touch now